‘Hoe kijkt coördinator Mary Angoro terug op het project?’
De partner vertelt... van 14 januari 2025 door Mary Angoro
Elk jaar vragen we onze partner hoe het project is gegaan en welke lessen de partner heeft geleerd.
Reporting period
Follow-up visit conducted on the 28th of October - please approve this form as is as I don't have more information
Report prepared by
Date of submission
Questions 1-3 to be answered no later than one month after the departure of the group, and where relevant to be revised no later than four months after the departure of the group
1. Describe the context in which the project was implemented, including any relevant information about the community, district, or country which affected activities carried out.
For example:
General issues, concerns, or developments in the education sector, or changes in the school year.
Insufficient number of teaching staff or health care staff, or delayed payment of salaries.
Diseases, conflicts, political instability, or socio-economic factors affecting operations in the community or country.
Food security issues.
2. Describe the original plan/idea for the project. Has the project been executed as planned? If changes were made, which changes and why?
3. Give a general description of the implementation of the project. What was done, how was it done, who did what, when was it done, why was it done.
Questions 4-6 to be answered no later than one month after the departure of the group, and where relevant to be revised no later than four months after the departure of the group
4. Buildings worked on.
a. What was constructed exactly (classrooms, water tanks, latrines, …)?
b. How was the building constructed? What construction methods were used? What kind of materials?
c. Who was the contractor? Where is he/she from?
d. Were labourers hired from the community? If yes, for what kind of tasks (skilled, unskilled)? If not, why not?
e. Is there a building code? If yes, was it applied/what parts were applied?
f. How were government authorities involved in planning, implementation, and quality control?
g. How was the quality of construction ensured? What should be done to improve the quality of construction, if anything?
h. How does this construction compare to other buildings of the same kind?
i. What went well, what did not go well, what could be done better?
5. Construction activities.
a. What construction activities were done before the group arrived? What was done with the group?
b. What tasks remained to be done after the group left? Which of these tasks are still remaining at the time of submission of this report?
6. Planning and operations.
a. When did construction start? When was construction completed?
b. When was the building first used? What is it used for? Who uses it?
c. Who is responsible for management, maintenance, and operational costs?
Questions 7-10 to be answered no later than one month after the departure of the group
7. Children’s programme.
a. When and where was the children’s programme organised?
b. What was done and who did what?
c. Which groups of children were invited and participated? What was the experience like for the children who participated? Were any children excluded? How many children participated?
d. How was the experience for the teachers? How many teachers participated?
e. Is there anything that either teachers or students learned during the children’s programme that they still use/continue to do?
f. Do you have any suggestions for future children’s programmes (what to do or what not to do)? What went well, what did not go well, what could be done better?
8. Cultural and touristic activities.
a. What activities were done to stimulate interaction and to get to know the culture?
b. How do you value the cultural aspects of this project? Was there mutual respect?
c. Do you have any suggestions for cultural activities in future projects (what to do or what not to do)? What went well, what did not go well, what could be done better?
9. Life Skills programme (if applicable).
a. When and where was the life skills programme organised? How many sessions were held? How many people attended each session? Was it the same group of people for each session?
b. What topics were discussed?
c. Who was invited and who participated? How were they invited? What motivated them to participate?
d. How did the youth experience the programme? Is there anything they learned or changed based on these exchanges?
e. How do you value the life skills programme?
f. Do you have any suggestions for future life skills programmes (what to do or what not to do)? What went well, what did not go well, what could be done better?
10. Football4Water (if applicable).
a. When and where was the football4water programme organised? How many training sessions and matches were held? How many people attended each session? Was it the same group of people for each session?
b. Who was invited and participated (including other schools/villages)? How were they invited? What motivated them to participate?
c. How did those attending the events experience the programme? Is there anything they learned or changed based on these exchanges? Was there an interest in the hygiene promotion part, or were people mostly interested in soccer?
d. Was there a local nurse or hygiene agent involved? How do you value the football4water programme and the input of Dutch participants as well as the input of the local nurse/hygiene agent, where relevant/applicable?
e. Do you have any suggestions for future football4water programmes (what to do or what not to do)? What went well, what did not go well, what could be done better?
Questions 11-17 to be answered no later than one month after the departure of the group, and where relevant to be revised no later than four months after the departure of the group
11. Leadership team World Servants.
a. How was the contact with the leadership team before they arrived? Do you need more/less interaction? Is anything missing?
b. How was the collaboration with the leadership team during their stay with you? Do you have any observations about their collaboration towards you as a partner, and towards the community?
c. Do you have any suggestions for better collaboration with future leadership teams (what to do or what not to do)? What went well, what did not go well, what could be done better? Please also feel free to let us know if you think any of the leaders are not fit to be a leader.
12. Collaboration with World Servants.
How did you experience the partnership with World Servants in the preparation and execution of this project? What were your expectations? Were these expectations met? How or how not?
13. Local leaders / key persons.
a. Who were the key persons involved locally? How were they involved?
b. How was the collaboration with them?
c. Do you have any suggestions for better collaboration with local leaders/key persons in the future (what to do or what not to do)? What went well, what did not go well, what could be done better?
14. Community.
a. How was the community involved? How did they participate in construction? In cultural exchange? In other areas?
b. How was it for the community to host a group? What are the advantages and disadvantages for the community of hosting a group?
c. How was the collaboration between the community, the partner, and the group? Was there mutual respect?
d. Do you have any suggestions for better collaboration with a community in the future (what to do or what not to do)? What went well, what did not go well, what could be done better?
15. Beneficiaries.
a. Who are the beneficiaries? How were they involved? How was the collaboration with them?
b. Do you have any suggestions for better collaboration with beneficiaries in the future (what to do or what not to do)? What went well, what did not go well, what could be done better?
16. (Local) government.
a. Which government authorities were involved? How were they involved? How was the collaboration with them?
b. Do you have any suggestions for better collaboration with government authorities in the future (what to do or what not to do)? What went well, what did not go well, what could be done better?
17. Unlimited project (if applicable).
a. Is there a difference between hosting a regular group and an unlimited group? If yes, in what sense?
b. How did you experience hosting a group that included persons with disabilities? What were the expectations beforehand and how did these compare to the actual experiences?
c. What does it mean for you and for the community to host a group that includes persons with disabilities?
Questions 18-21 to be answered no later than one month after the departure of the group
18. Accommodation.
a. How was accommodation arranged (space for sleeping, meals, meetings, latrines, showers)?
b. Do you have any suggestions to improve accommodation arrangements in the future (what to do or what not to do)? What went well, what did not go well, what could be done better?
19. Food.
a. How was food arranged? Were the cooks from the community or from outside the community? Did they cook local food or ‘foreign’ food?
b. Did any of the participants assist with cooking? If so, was this considered positive or negative? Did the cooks feel respected/appreciated?
c. Did anybody get sick with food poisoning? If yes, did few people get sick or many?
d. Do you have any suggestions to improve food arrangements in the future (what to do or what not to do)? What went well, what did not go well, what could be done better?
20. Transportation.
a. How was transportation arranged? What types of transportation were used where?
b. Were there any technical or other issues? If yes, what issues? How were these addressed?
c. Was the location accessible by vehicle?
d. Do you have any suggestions to improve transportation in the future (what to do or what not to do)? What went well, what did not go well, what could be done better?
21. Safety.
a. What precautions were taken to prevent safety issues? Were these effective?
b. Were there any safety issues or incidents? If yes, which ones and how were they addressed?
c. Do you have any suggestions to improve safety measures in the future (what to do or what not to do)? What went well, what did not go well, what could be done better?
Questions 22-26 to be answered no later than four months after the departure of the group
22. Which partner staff was involved and how was each of them involved?
23. How is monitoring done? What tools are used? Who is involved in follow-up?
24. Were there any unforeseen impacts, either negative or positive?
25. Were there any challenges? If so, how did you handle these?
For example, challenges can relate to conflicts, impact of weather conditions, inflation, transportation, socio-political situation, ...
26. Lessons learned.
Describe the lessons your organisation learned from organising the project within this community. In other words: what would you do the same next time and what would you do differently?
27. Do you have any feedback or suggestions for World Servants to improve future projects?
Questions 27-28 to be answered no later than four months after the departure of the group
28. Did you use any funding from other donors/sources or own funding for the construction process? If yes, from whom? Who contributed what?
Please also include this information in the financial report.
29. Is there any other information you would like to share?
Share personal stories of beneficiaries, community members, partner staff, local authorities, etc. (See guidelines.) These can be students, teachers, health care staff, patients, parents, construction workers, cooks, representatives of local government, colleagues from your organisation, etc.
Please provide the logframe as a separate attachment, with disaggregated data (male/female, ages, grades, …).
